I Missed a Payment to my 401(k) Loan
diamondcpas
August 27, 2017

A loan from a 401(k) plan can be a valuable source of funds, especially when most other avenues for quick cash are unavailable. Aside for the admonition that retirement savings need to be kept for retirement if at all possible, borrowers in these circumstances should be aware of the terms of the loan, especially the schedule of re-payments.

If an account holder misses even one scheduled payment and then doesn’t make it up during a relatively-short “cure” period, the entire loan is considered a taxable distribution in which immediate income tax, and typically a 10 percent early withdrawal penalty, will be due. A recent taxpayer, who missed payments while on maternity leave, faced such a situation in which the IRS demanded payment and the Tax Court could not provide relief.

Crossed signals. The taxpayer took out a qualifying loan from her employer’s Section 401(k) plan immediately before she went on maternity leave. While out on leave without pay, she failed to make the first bi-weekly scheduled payment, having assumed that she only had to make payments through a payroll deduction. For the same incorrect assumption, she failed to make the payment within the so-called “cure period”. The taxpayer argued that while she was on leave, the substantially level amortization requirement under Reg. §1.72(p)-1 did not apply. The IRS argued that a taxable distribution occurred, accelerating the entire principal as well as triggering an early distribution penalty.

Court’s holding. The court held for the IRS. The court’s hands were tied by the terms of the loan. While the taxpayer’s circumstances and general confusion over the default and attempt to cure could not also excuse assessment of an early distribution penalty, however, the court did lift the accuracy-related penalty for failing to initially report the income – the only relief that was available under the circumstances.

Comment. The lesson to be learned here is that a plan participant should not rely on an employer/plan sponsor to protect against an unintentional “default” on a plan loan through missing a payment and cure period payment on the loan. Here, the employee had assumed that a payroll deduction covered the loan but she was deemed responsible by the court to monitor both the agreement and her pay stubs, despite any inattention during maternity leave.

Frias, TC Memo. 2017-139

0 Comments

Recent Posts

Crypto Taxation Update

Crypto Taxation Update

The landscape of cryptocurrency taxation has recently seen notable developments, notably with the IRS Revenue Ruling 2023-14 shedding light on the treatment of rewards accrued from staking cryptocurrency. For those acquainted with the intricate world of digital asset...

Unlocking the Benefits: Exploring Electric Vehicle Tax Credits

Unlocking the Benefits: Exploring Electric Vehicle Tax Credits

Are you considering making the switch to an electric vehicle (EV)? The roads are abuzz with the surge in EV popularity, and for good reason. In this article, we’re diving into the world of electric vehicles and the tax credits that come with them. Let’s uncover the...

When You Might Not Need A Trust

When You Might Not Need A Trust

When it comes to estate planning, trusts are often employed to transfer wealth to the next generation. Trusts can provide numerous benefits, including asset protection, privacy, and control over the distribution of assets.  There are plenty of circumstances when  a...

QUESTIONS?

Reach out for a consultation.

Diamond & Associates CPAs